Sunday, November 15, 2009
Wednesday, September 30, 2009
ac⋅a⋅de⋅mi⋅a
Thursday, September 24, 2009
Comfort·Food

Saturday, September 19, 2009
Denny·Crane
Wednesday, June 24, 2009
Sawadee·Kwa







Monday, June 15, 2009
Tuesday, May 05, 2009
ex·ac·er·bate
Saturday, May 02, 2009
rea⋅son
oh god i'v got to spend more time mugging =(Maam / SirFirstly, the programs were conducted in Secondary School. Which mean that the target group of students are in the 13 to around 18 years old. The statistics show that that the average age for teenage pregnancies and STD's are falling in this group. The quantum incidence is rising each year while the age group is falling each year. I will substantiate my claims with the following facts."Associate Professor P C Wong, chief of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department at the National University Hospital, said: "The statistics speak for themselves. Every year, as I said, 1,300 to 1,500 teenage abortions occur. The numbers have not dropped. And STDs (sexually-transmitted diseases) have gone up, more than double. So we have to sit up and pay attention to the statistics.""And in 2005, 678 teens aged between 10 and 19 years sought help for sexually-transmitted diseases, compared to 256 in 2001."There are actually more facts and figures but a quick search on google will prove the point i am making, which is that this target group of people NEED guidance. Even if you believe your daughters don't need them, their classmates, their schoolmates maybe their CCA group mates might. (I might add that these selfsame schoolmates play an important role in the devepment of your child morally or otherwise.)These statistics show that simply preaching “Singapore home values”, IS NOT WORKING. Going up to a kid and saying. “Don’t do this, Don’t do that” is not working anymore!. Kids respond to this kind of approach by simply “tuning out” or “zoning out”. Its sorta like Civics and Moral Education back when i was in secondary school. Majority simply wrote what the teacher wanted to hear and none of it actually sunk in.AWARE and MOE are trying to reach this target group by accepting them for who they are, specifically people who deviate from social norms, and give them facts and figures and scientific advice on how to modify their behaviour to their own good. If you have a foolproof method of picking them out from a general secondary school population then please contact MOE and let them know, because the only way they can safely cover this target group is to make it the average and provide the information for all. For parents like yourself, there is a exclusion form yes?Instead of simply telling MOE to take away the program, maybe you can come up with an alternative how you can adress the problem as delineated in the figures? Figure out how to give a kid advice without rejecting who they are first (ie; homosexuals, kids who practise anal sex, kids who practise premaritial sex, kids with STD’s, kids who have unprotected sex). You must understand that when you reject this kids actions and give them the impression that they are ALREADY committing sin.. they are NOT going to open up to you and NOT going to listen to good advice.The whole excercise of naming stuff as “Neutral” is not to promote the act or behaviour but to prevent kids who are ALREADY involved in those act (refer to statistics) to NOT zone out and actually listen to good advice. Not as you put it “MOE capturing young, immature minds and filling them with subversive rot.”You are assuming, wrongly, that all kids in the public school system are as fine examples of teenage girls as your daughters. Sadly that is not the case. Many social factors for example, poverty, lack of parental guidance or where bread and butter issues at home take precedence over moral development contribute to this. This program attempts to coax this group of people out of hiding and actually give a listening year to some good advice.I am making an assuption here.. but kindly consider it. Assuming that all girls are split into 2 groups. One where they are like your daughters, the other where they participate privately in socially deviant behaviour. When MOE and AWARE place their stance as “Neutral” they are in fact trusting parents like you (refer to your opening sentence ”Together with the home, our schools have to work carefully and painstakingly to shape the morals of our children”) to tell your kids “School says its neutral, but here under my house and in our culture its not”, and being the fine examples they are, these group of children will listen. On the flipside, now the entire deviant group is now open to discussion and advice rather then simply zoning out!In essence they are now able to to address the problem as shown in the statistics above!@your second comment.I agree that anal sex being healthy is quite contentious. I was simply replying to Anony commenter @ May 1, 2009 5:40 PM that it is not illegal. Once again the point of this exercise is not to promote or okay homosexuality and its acts. Rather to not exclude kids who already participate in these acts and to give them sound facts and advice. The point is not saying homosexuality is okay.. but the point is to adress this group of homosexuals and advice them.I also disagree that AWARE old guard is “a rabid feminist organisation pushing a homosexual agenda”. The EOGM will settle this matter of contention.RespectfullyR SelvarajaAge: 25Current Undergrad at SIMOperations Manager @ an Established Security FirmWell Wisher =)
Friday, May 01, 2009
os⋅trich
such a one sided argument.Neutral means NEITHER good NOR bad.It is your job as a parent to inculcate values.If your child goes and hears that being homosexual is NEUTRAL and somehow decides to join the other team is simply shows that you've been doing a terrible job inculcating values.12+ years at homewith YOU and 10 minutes spend on the topic in a sex ed class turns ur kid LGBT... Not really rocket science to see who holds more blame.The facts and figures speak for themselves, No parent wants their kid to engage in premarital sex or to become LBGT, BUT STILL there are a significant number of kids that do that.Why are there so many teenage pregnancies and kids having unprotected sex or turning LBGT?I have 2 theories..1. Bad Parents2. Parents who go the Ostrich way and pretend the problem does not exist and simply thinks that their children are angels who happen to not watch ANY TV or any non local news on the internet where LBGT-ism and premaritial sex is espoused? Whereby the kids are unable to turn to parents(like you) cos they know they will be treated with holy fury and treated like a sinner for even THINKING about it.. and then simply go ahead andexperiment anyway.AWARE + MOE fills this void with cold hard SECULAR FACTS so that informed choice can be made. If you think your child is to stupid to make decisions then go ahead and sign the exclusion forms, its there for Ostriches like you who rather ignore the problem. But i think there are kids out there with more sense and intelligence to make the right choice when faced with facts and are in the position where they are unable to speak to their parents cos their parents like you are simply too one track minded to offer the right kind of guidance they need.Wake up and smell the coffee, go look at the numbers of teenage pregnancies and abortions. It is scary! Even if you think your child is perfect and needs no further guidance from you, her classmate could be one who is engaging in premaritial sex and maybe experimenting in lesbianism.. and maybe SHE could influence your daughter. How are you going to handle that? Homeschool your kid?If you want to send your kid through the public education system you mustunderstand that selfsame public includes children from different home with different values. MOE cant come up with a system for only your kid, but a general one.Its common sense that MOE has seen the numbers of teenage pregs and abortions and feedback from teachers where kids come up to them for advice and realised that parents arent doing enough.So have a heart for all those kids (maybe yours) who need the guidance and the provision of facts and good secular advice to make a decision cos they are in a position where they cant turn to parents cos they need more reason to change rather then "Cos God Said So"
Wednesday, April 29, 2009
be⋅ware
I subscribe to the belief that for every one lie you find out about... There is like ten you didn't... the covert nature of the coup and the many inconsistencies springing up daily is simply unbecoming of leadership of such an organisation especially since there is strong behind-the-scenes puppeteering from a closet feminist with a LKY complex who deems AWARE unworthy of her presence on the EXCO.
The cavalier attitude in the many dismissals, a very dramatic lock change and a press conference where they asked more questions then answered simply show that these people have a hidden agenda and since they have not deemed it necessary to let it be known, speculation has gone amok.
At the very bottom line, even before ANYONE comes to the door to get some help from AWARE, the new guard seems to be putting up notice that LBGT will be exempt from any help whatsoever. What happened to helping "all"?
About the sexual education angle, I find it stupid to think that a hour long workshop where one of the many points covered include setting the tone that LBGT tendencies and actions are "neutral" will suddenly PUSH young impressionable minds into invoking LBGT-ism. I mean, if any parent comes up and blames this program for turning their kids into a LBGT, he/she is going to turn into a laughing stock. Here is someone who is SO clueless about their kids actions and behaviour when they spend their entire childhood at home and completely miss the signs that the kids are exhibiting LBGT tendencies. Yes I am saying it, if your child turns LBGT cos AWARE says it’s neutral to be it, then its your fault... You should have seen it coming and handled it. Not blame the school sheesh... (Disclaimer: am not saying any LBGT come from bad parents, just that they are painting themselves as bad parents for blaming it on a sexual ed workshop). Anyway, if you feel so strongly about it, there is an option to not send your kids for the workshop?
So instead of educating parents on the program and highlighting the exclusion form, "Mentor" took over AWARE and change sex ed to say LBGT = BAD? Old-AWARE should be applauded for having trust in our intelligence to make the right decisions, the new guard on the other hand seems to want to rather insult our intelligence it and use its position to spoonfeed some prejudged and slanted information.
Someone should put Josie in the same situation as Constance was put in, where she faced a hostile group of lesbian and bi women who felt that AWARE had virtually ignored that group of women and see how she fares or rather flounders.
Oh wait, actually I can imagine it, she will start with something like “It’s a very complex and controversial situation we are in now…” then pass the mike to Maureen...
ROFL






